
Billions are being deployed into charging infrastructure — too often on instinct, incentives, and guesswork. OptiYield replaces gut feel with evidence, so operators, hosts, and investors put capital where it actually pays off.
Noreen StitelmanFounder / CEOI started OptiYield because one problem kept standing out across the industry: the EV charging build-out is one of the largest infrastructure investments of our era, yet siting decisions are still made with surprisingly little rigor. A promising-looking corner gets a charger; a year later it sits underused while demand piles up two exits away.
Stranded chargers aren't just a bad outcome for one operator — they slow the entire transition. Every underperforming site makes the next investment harder to justify. I believed the same quantitative discipline that reshaped finance and pricing could bring that clarity to where and why to build.
OptiYield is that discipline, packaged into a single, defensible score.
Baseball teams once relied on scouts' intuition. Then they started letting the data find the undervalued players everyone else overlooked. OptiYield does the same for charging sites — surfacing the markets where demand potential outruns competition, and flagging the crowded ones before you commit.
Avoid the money-losing sites. A low score is as valuable as a high one — it tells you where not to sink capital before the concrete is poured.
Move first on the underserved markets where demand potential is high and competition is thin — the sites most likely to earn their return.
Back every decision with an auditable, public-data-driven rationale — the kind of evidence lenders, partners, and boards expect.
OptiYield is early, and that's the opportunity. We're working with a small group of operators, site hosts, and investors to pressure-test the model against real decisions and refine it around how the industry actually works. If that's you, let's talk.